Login to participate
  
Register   Lost ID/password?
Louis Kessler's Behold Blog » Blog Entry           prev Prev   Next next

Unexpected BNF - Mon, 2 May 2016

Just before I released the last version of Behold a month ago, a user asked if there was a way to display all the burials and nothing else. They wanted to check out all the cemeteries in a city they were going to.

I thought Behold could do that already. In the Organize Tags page, I allow selection of which tags you want to display. I thought it should be possible because you can select the BURI tag and unselect everything else, like this:

image

But it didn’t quite work right. First, subordinate tags to the BURI tag would be hidden, so you’d have to find them and select them again. Doing so would sometimes make some unwanted data show up elsewhere.

Also, I found the tag hiding was not working in the Place details and the Source details. And that’s where it was needed most. If it would have worked, it would have produced very useful information in Behold’s Everything Report that would have looked like the following screen shots.

First, the person info would still show everybody, but only their burial facts:

image

Then for places, only those places having burials would display:

image

Then the sources would only show those that were claimed for burials:

image

Having this feature would allow not just a customized listing of burials, but would allow lists of any desired fact or combination of facts. For example, maybe you had access to some school service or military service records and you want a concise listing of those to refer to.

So I decided to include the ability to hide or display facts as part of the (hopefully) final set of changes to the Everything Report prior to implementing saving and editing.

When I started implementing this a couple of weeks ago, I immediately realized that specification of the tags to include and exclude did not work at the tag level. I needed to make that specification work at the fact level. That way, each fact type (e.g. birth, education, marriage, death, burial, etc.) could be shown or hidden as desired, and the same can be done for those fact types in the Place Details and Source Details. Then I’d add a checkbox to deselect (or select) all facts so that it would be easy to select the 1 or 2 facts that you wanted shown (or hidden).

I got that working and it didn’t do too bad. It produced the above screen shots when burials were selected.

I was able to do this fairly simply by extending my tag definitions in my Delphi code. My previous code that only allowed the selection of tags looked like this:

image

This code set up each tag, the text that would display, whether this tag was hidden by default or not, and which versions of GEDCOM this tag was valid in.

Some of the tags, especially in the HEAD record were shown with the record name and the tag name using a period to separate them, e.g.:

image

Now I’d be separating out the facts from these tags so that only the fact tags could be selected. I decided I could identify these if I prefixed them with the record tag they came from, which would only be INDI (individual) or FAM (family) records.  So now the facts section of this code started to look like this:

image

The tricky part of all this was picking out which of the tags were facts one level under the INDI and FAM record. There are some tags, such as SOUR and NOTE and OBJE that can be both at level 1 describing the person, but also can be at level 2 describing a fact. There were also some odd things, such as CHAN, the record change date tag, the ID number, and additional information Behold supplies at the fact level that needed to be handled so that only the desired facts would display and nothing else.

So to rigorously ensure I had all the facts, I had to go back to the GEDCOM 5.5.1 standard and work my way through it and pick out all the fact tags, and all the detail tags and the ones that could be used as either a fact or a detail.

After a couple of successively improving attempts at this … Eureka!  I realized something. I had in place the structure I needed to do an automated and effectively perfect parsing of a GEDCOM file. The GEDCOM standard is constructed using a grammar known as Backus-Naur Form or BNF. It defines what constructs are allowed. An excerpt of it from GEDCOM looks like this:

image

The items in double angle brackets are subordinate structures, e.g.:

image

and the items in single angle brackets are the data tags, e.g.:

image

Unexpectedly, I had figured out how to simply enter the GEDCOM BNF notation into my code, and Behold will do the checking to ensure that the input conforms to the GEDCOM standard.  My code will now look like:

image

image

What this does is allow me to just about take the GEDCOM BNF and copy it directly into my own code. There is no translation or mapping I need to do so it is relatively painless and less error-prone.

I will add extra parameter calls to my SetDefaultTag routine for the minimum and maximum number of occurrences of each construct and the minimum and maximum size of the data values, which will allow my routine (to be renamed to LoadBNF) to automatically check those limits and issue a message if the GEDCOM is not proper. The really nice thing is that I’ll have the actual GEDCOM structure name coded, so for any error messages Behold will be able to display the exact structure name the error is in, e.g.:

<<NAME_PERSONAL>> more than 120 characters

I was planning to implement complete GEDCOM checking in a few months from now once I started working on GEDCOM 5.5.1 output. I had looked previously at Delphi implementations of BNF, and was not looking forward to the task of either adapting them or writing my own. Believe me, writing a grammar parser is not fun. That’s likely because it’s something they make you do in 2nd year Computer Science classes as a lab assignment. So I’m very pleased. I never expected the methodology to do this would just fall in place so conveniently.

The beauty of this coding structure is that I’ll be able to go through previous GEDCOM versions (5.5, 5.3, 5.0, 5.5EL, FTM Text) quite quickly and incorporate full checks of those structures as well.

This will also extend to similarly structured grammars that are also made up of hierarchies of tags and values. This includes JSON Schema, which means I can use this for reading Behold’s own file format when I develop that along with editing. I’d likely also be able to quickly develop the input routines for FamilySearch’s GEDCOM X when the time comes to do so.

This is what programming is about and what makes it so much fun. You build up a structure and methodology in small steps and it evolves into something that you never expected and amazes you.

If you got to this point in this post, thanks for lasting through all this technical jabber. I had to spout this off. Now I feel better.

I’m working hard. Lots of great things to come.

3 Comments           comments Leave a Comment

1. Keith Riggle (geneatech)
United States flag
Joined: Sun, 7 Apr 2013
14 blog comments, 0 forum posts
Posted: Tue, 3 May 2016  Permalink

That would be awesome if Behold could do complete GEDCOM validation, now that Tim Forsythe has discontinued VGedX. And it will be especially convenient to have it packaged with a GEDCOM reader/writer/reporter.

2. Louis Kessler (lkessler)
Canada flag
Joined: Sun, 9 Mar 2003
227 blog comments, 226 forum posts
Posted: Tue, 3 May 2016  Permalink

Oh no! I didn’t realize that Tim had discontinued VGedX. But it’s much worse. When I went to check his site, I now see that Tim shut down completely last month. Not just VGedX, but his entire GigaTrees site and all his other great utilities including Vivify, Bonkers, CENtar, G-List, Splatter, Stat Range, The Name Game, D-List and A-List. See: http://www.gensoftreviews.com/index.php?s=forsythe. He had some really amazing and unique tools in there. It’s a real loss that he’s decided to stop supporting them.

3. Kevin Ireland (kmireland)
United States flag
Joined: Wed, 31 Aug 2016
1 blog comment, 0 forum posts
Posted: Wed, 31 Aug 2016  Permalink

Just bought Behold today, so barely started into it - but reports on burials by people and places will be very useful.

Leave a Comment

You must login to comment.

Login to participate
  
Register   Lost ID/password?