Louis Kessler’s Behold Blog     The Behold User Forum

New Year, new start Louis.

Not sure to congratulate you for the 10 years Louis, or again reiterate my support for your product. I am very keen to see the next version and subsequent after that. Good luck for the future of Behold. And good luck for the cruise presentations. Brett - Forum member since 12 Jan 2009

Dave I am running similar configuration to you. If you like, send me GEDCOM and I will see what it does here. I have had no problems on any size GEDCOM that loads into Behold. Brett

Push...push...push

The next version to be called 1.1 will be released soon. So, how many versions have been called 1.1, or should that have been: The next version, to be called 1.1, will be released soon ----heeheehee But seriously, keep up the good work and the small course corrections. I eagerly await 1.1

Thanks for the explanation. It was the 'set up a bit differently than other programs' that tricked me.

After import of GEDCOM, when I check the log file for full details, the following appears towards the bottom of the section. Only the first 100 of each type of message are listed. To display all messages: Uncheck the "Log File: Max 100 messages" setting under Organize -> Report -> Extra Info and reinput ...

Louis The following is created after GEDCOM export by one of the programs I use. Behold does not flag it as error or warning. 1 NAME Shown as First Middle Last on First2 Middle2 Last2's Marriage Record, NSW BDM 1891/999. 2 DATE 01 JAN 1891 2 PLAC Sydney, New South Wales, Australia However, one of the other ...

Louis Another date query. What is your (and therefore probably Behold's) interpetation of the following date: 03 Mar 2012 Is it valid or invalid GEDCOM 5.5.1 if it has the leading zero? Brett

Eagerly waiting for this correction. Any sign of 1.0.5 or will it be in 1.1??