Comments on: Ages are Weird http://www.beholdgenealogy.com/blog/?p=1081 the Development of my Genealogy Program named Behold http://www.beholdgenealogy.com/blog http://www.beholdgenealogy.com/blog/../beholdblog.gif Comments by Louis Kessler are Copyright 2000-2013 Louis Kessler, All Rights Reserved. Comments by others belong to the people who made them. By: Louis Kessler http://www.beholdgenealogy.com/blog/?p=1081#comment-484 Louis Kessler Thu, 05 Apr 2012 05:46:04 +0000 http://www.beholdgenealogy.com/blog/?p=1081#comment-484 Brett, Yes, of course you're correct and a 1900 birth could be in the 1901 records. So I should have been more precise and instead of "looked through all 1900 records", I should have said: "looked through all records containing a birth in 1900". Louis Brett,

Yes, of course you’re correct and a 1900 birth could be in the 1901 records.

So I should have been more precise and instead of “looked through all 1900 records”, I should have said: “looked through all records containing a birth in 1900″.

Louis

]]> By: Brett http://www.beholdgenealogy.com/blog/?p=1081#comment-482 Brett Thu, 05 Apr 2012 05:14:48 +0000 http://www.beholdgenealogy.com/blog/?p=1081#comment-482 "For example, let’s say your grandfather died in 1980 and you know he was 80 years old. You’ve looked through all the 1900 records and can’t find his birth certificate anywhere. Maybe the solution is to look through the 1899 records as well." However, depending on Records, lodgement etc, it could be 1st Quarter 1901 at best or anytime onwards, at worst. Brett “For example, let’s say your grandfather died in 1980 and you know he was 80 years old. You’ve looked through all the 1900 records and can’t find his birth certificate anywhere. Maybe the solution is to look through the 1899 records as well.”

However, depending on Records, lodgement etc, it could be 1st Quarter 1901 at best or anytime onwards, at worst.

Brett

]]>