<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Literally Nothing From RootsMagic</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.beholdgenealogy.com/blog/?feed=rss2&#038;p=1070" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.beholdgenealogy.com/blog/?p=1070</link>
	<description>the Development of my Genealogy Program named Behold</description>
	
		
	<copyright>Comments by Louis Kessler are Copyright 2000-2013 Louis Kessler, All Rights Reserved.  Comments by others belong to the people who made them.</copyright>
		<item>
		<title>By: Brett</title>
		<link>http://www.beholdgenealogy.com/blog/?p=1070#comment-453</link>

				<dc:creator>Brett</dc:creator>

		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 11:26:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beholdgenealogy.com/blog/?p=1070#comment-453</guid>
		<description>A few more results, all Opened the file, without any report.

GRAMPS
GENViewer
GENMatcher</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A few more results, all Opened the file, without any report.</p>
<p>GRAMPS<br />
GENViewer<br />
GENMatcher</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Louis Kessler</title>
		<link>http://www.beholdgenealogy.com/blog/?p=1070#comment-452</link>

				<dc:creator>Louis Kessler</dc:creator>

		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 01:22:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beholdgenealogy.com/blog/?p=1070#comment-452</guid>
		<description>Brett:  

Thanks for posting this here. If I may add for the readers a few important things that you pointed out to me in your emails to me about this:

FTM 2010 could not read this file because it says it is GEDCOM Version 5.5.1 and FTM gave the message: "GEDCOM file must be version 5.5 or greater". Hmmm. So when I produce my totally GEDCOM 5.5.1 compliant output, does that mean FTM won't be able to read it?

Legacy wouldn't open the file because it just hung. To me, I don't care what the cause is. If Behold hangs on anything, it's my top priority to fix that.
 
TMG 8 wouldn't open the file because Unicode is not supported. 

GedPad Pro and Genealogica Grafica did open the file, but you said they reported unlinked people/families. That would indicate that the Hex 00 prevented them from inputting the complete person records that contained the Hex 00.
  
Regarding the other programs that do read it, as Tamura points out in his comment &lt;a href="https://plus.google.com/u/0/110577412544855206241/posts/UnjNBFr7FWY#110577412544855206241/posts/UnjNBFr7FWY" rel="nofollow"&gt;in his Google+ posting&lt;/a&gt;, "Many applications will read it because they do not bother to properly parse GEDCOM files. One could add that most of these applications are likely to export it too."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brett:  </p>
<p>Thanks for posting this here. If I may add for the readers a few important things that you pointed out to me in your emails to me about this:</p>
<p>FTM 2010 could not read this file because it says it is GEDCOM Version 5.5.1 and FTM gave the message: &#8220;GEDCOM file must be version 5.5 or greater&#8221;. Hmmm. So when I produce my totally GEDCOM 5.5.1 compliant output, does that mean FTM won&#8217;t be able to read it?</p>
<p>Legacy wouldn&#8217;t open the file because it just hung. To me, I don&#8217;t care what the cause is. If Behold hangs on anything, it&#8217;s my top priority to fix that.</p>
<p>TMG 8 wouldn&#8217;t open the file because Unicode is not supported. </p>
<p>GedPad Pro and Genealogica Grafica did open the file, but you said they reported unlinked people/families. That would indicate that the Hex 00 prevented them from inputting the complete person records that contained the Hex 00.</p>
<p>Regarding the other programs that do read it, as Tamura points out in his comment <a href="https://plus.google.com/u/0/110577412544855206241/posts/UnjNBFr7FWY#110577412544855206241/posts/UnjNBFr7FWY" rel="nofollow">in his Google+ posting</a>, &#8220;Many applications will read it because they do not bother to properly parse GEDCOM files. One could add that most of these applications are likely to export it too.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brett</title>
		<link>http://www.beholdgenealogy.com/blog/?p=1070#comment-451</link>

				<dc:creator>Brett</dc:creator>

		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 22:13:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beholdgenealogy.com/blog/?p=1070#comment-451</guid>
		<description>Your comment 'I wonder how bad a problem this is and if there are very many other programs out there that might choke on the “nothing” in the RootsMagic GEDCOM' made me think hard about the same.

Thanks Louis (and Bart) for a copy of the GEDCOM file.

Results for some software include:

Ahnenblatt                                 Opened file
Behold                                       Imported 9 records only
dynastree Home Edition              Opened file
Family Historian                          Opened file   
Family Tree Legends                   Opened file 
GedPad Pro                               Opened file      
Genealogica Grafica                    Opened file   
Legacy Standard Edition              Did not open file   
Family Tree Builder                      Opened file
Family Tree Maker                       Did not open file
Personal Historian Essentials        Imported 9 records only
RootsMagic                                 Opened file
The Complete Genealogy Builder   Opened file
The Complete Genealogy Reporter Opened file
The Master Genealogist 8              Did not open file, Unicode not supported 
TNG                                             Opened file</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your comment &#8216;I wonder how bad a problem this is and if there are very many other programs out there that might choke on the “nothing” in the RootsMagic GEDCOM&#8217; made me think hard about the same.</p>
<p>Thanks Louis (and Bart) for a copy of the GEDCOM file.</p>
<p>Results for some software include:</p>
<p>Ahnenblatt                                 Opened file<br />
Behold                                       Imported 9 records only<br />
dynastree Home Edition              Opened file<br />
Family Historian                          Opened file<br />
Family Tree Legends                   Opened file<br />
GedPad Pro                               Opened file<br />
Genealogica Grafica                    Opened file<br />
Legacy Standard Edition              Did not open file<br />
Family Tree Builder                      Opened file<br />
Family Tree Maker                       Did not open file<br />
Personal Historian Essentials        Imported 9 records only<br />
RootsMagic                                 Opened file<br />
The Complete Genealogy Builder   Opened file<br />
The Complete Genealogy Reporter Opened file<br />
The Master Genealogist 8              Did not open file, Unicode not supported<br />
TNG                                             Opened file</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brett</title>
		<link>http://www.beholdgenealogy.com/blog/?p=1070#comment-450</link>

				<dc:creator>Brett</dc:creator>

		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 21:52:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beholdgenealogy.com/blog/?p=1070#comment-450</guid>
		<description>You state: 'This code needs to be fast'.

But what actual effect to Behold load time will this do for large GEDCOM files?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You state: &#8216;This code needs to be fast&#8217;.</p>
<p>But what actual effect to Behold load time will this do for large GEDCOM files?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.622 seconds -->
